NDA - Thousands of calls, follow-ups, documents, and application updates were being handled manually. We built the platform that now moves each review from first contact to staff-ready application.

1,000sReviews at scale

0Manual outreach

3Follow-up phases

2Portals, one process

The problem

Thousands of reviews. A team moving every one by hand.

The organisation needed to process reviews at a scale where the existing operation was becoming the bottleneck. Staff were calling people one by one, asking the required questions, recording answers, chasing anyone who didn't respond, following up on incomplete applications, collecting supporting evidence, checking documents, and updating records as each case moved forward. The work didn't stop after the call. An unanswered phone meant another attempt. An incomplete review meant follow-up. Missing evidence meant another message. New documents had to be checked. Application statuses had to be updated. Questions had to reach the right person. Multiply that by thousands of reviews and the operation becomes mostly coordination. The existing portal could hold the information. What it couldn't do was move the work forward on its own.

How it runs · 08 steps

People Enter a CampaignAn admin imports the people who need to complete a review. Contact details and existing context become the starting point for the workflow.

trigger

Outreach Starts AutomaticallyThe platform distributes contacts across available voice agents and begins outreach without staff dialling through the list manually.

agent

The Review Happens by VoiceThe agent walks the person through the review naturally over the phone and turns the conversation into structured application data.

Every Outcome Gets a Next StepCompleted, partially completed, unanswered, and unreachable contacts are separated automatically so each can follow the appropriate path.

process

Follow-Up Keeps MovingPeople who still need attention can move through additional calls, email, SMS, or self-service completion instead of staff maintaining callback lists manually.

automation

Applicants Finish What Is MissingThe applicant portal lets people review their information, complete outstanding fields, upload evidence, check their status, and continue without requiring staff to re-enter their information.

portal

Evidence Is CheckedUploaded documents are analyzed against the application and evidence requirements. Relevant information is extracted, mismatches are flagged, and uncertain cases are surfaced for human review.

Staff Get the Review Ready to Act OnThe admin portal brings together application data, evidence, activity history, call information, outstanding enquiries, and review status so staff can focus on decisions and exceptions rather than assembling the case.

output

Engineering detail · 04

The workflow continues after the conversationA successful call is not the end of the process. Every contact outcome changes what should happen next. Completed reviews move forward. Partial reviews remain active. Non-responders can enter another outreach phase. Missing information can move into self-service completion. The platform tracks where each person is and determines the next operational step instead of relying on staff to maintain follow-up lists. The call collects the review. The system carries it forward.

One lifecycle, two different experiencesApplicants and staff need completely different interfaces. The applicant portal is designed around completing information, uploading evidence, checking progress, and responding to what is still required. The admin portal is designed around campaigns, applications, evidence, enquiries, progress, review decisions, and exceptions. Both operate against the same underlying application lifecycle. The user sees what they need to complete. Staff see what they need to act on.

Documents arrive pre-checkedSupporting evidence isn't simply uploaded and left for someone to inspect manually. Documents are analyzed as they enter the platform. The system extracts relevant fields, identifies the document type and issuer, compares information against the application, flags mismatches, and assigns a verification state. Documents that clearly satisfy the requirements can move forward while uncertain or conflicting evidence is surfaced to staff. AI performs the first pass. Humans keep the final judgment.

The operation has its own control systemAt this scale, automation needs visibility and recovery, not just successful happy paths. Campaign execution is batched and protected against duplicate runs. Failures can stop execution before they cascade. Application statuses are advanced by scheduled rules. Enquiries are surfaced automatically. AI usage is tracked. Operational failures are monitored. Staff can see what has happened, what still needs attention, and where intervention is required. Automation removed the repetitive work without removing operational control.

Result

The operation now brings the work to the team. The biggest change wasn't that an AI agent could make a phone call. It was what no longer had to happen around that call. Staff no longer need to work through lists of people one by one just to start a review. They don't need to manually turn every conversation into application data, maintain callback lists, chase every incomplete case, repeatedly check whether evidence has arrived, or assemble information across disconnected steps before they can act. The platform keeps that work moving. Outreach begins automatically. Conversations become structured records. Non-responders move into follow-up. Applicants complete missing information through their own portal. Evidence is collected and pre-checked. Application states advance as requirements are satisfied. By the time staff need to intervene, much of the coordination required to get the case there has already happened. The portal used to be where people entered the work. Now it's where completed work arrives.

NextInvoiceFlow →100+ invoices were being processed by hand every month. InvoiceFlow automated the entire process, from the email arriving to the invoice being filed and entered into the ledger.

Bring me a problem like this →